Gateway P-7808u: to Quad or Not to Quad?
by Jarred Walton on April 13, 2009 3:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Laptops
Specifications and Features
Gateway P-7808u FX Specifications | |
Processor | Core 2 Quad Q9000 (2.0GHz 1066FSB 2x3MB L2) |
Chipset | Intel PM45 + ICH9M-E |
Memory | 2x2048MB DDR3-1066 |
Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS 1GB |
Display | 17.0" Glossy WXGA+ (1440x900) |
Hard Drive | 500GB 5400RPM |
Optical Drive | 8x DVDR SuperMulti |
Networking | Gigabit Ethernet (Marvel Yukon 88E8071 PCI-E) Intel WiFi Link 5100 Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR |
Audio | 2-Channel HD Audio (2.0 Speakers) |
Battery | 9-cell 86.5Whr |
Front Side | WiFi On/Off Switch Display Latch |
Left Side | ExpressCard/54 SD/MMC/xD/MS Pro reader 1 x Mini FireWire 1 x USB 2.0 Gigabit Ethernet 1 x eSATA VGA Microphone and Headphone |
Right Side | Kensington Lock 2 x USB 2.0 Heat Exhaust Optical Drive |
Back Side | Heat Exhaust Power Adapter Modem |
Operating System | Windows Vista Home Premium 32/64-bit Windows Vista Ultimate 32/64-bit |
Dimensions | 15.75" x 11.75" x 1.3"-1.7" (WxDxH) |
Weight | 9.05 lbs (with 9-cell battery) |
Extras | 1.3MP Webcam 104-Key Keyboard 8-Key Multimedia Quick Access Panel Microsoft Works 60-day Symantec Norton 360 Trial |
Warranty | 1-year standard; optional warranty extensions available with many resellers |
Price | Starting at $1700 online |
The basic specifications haven't changed much since the P-7811. Here's a quick recap of the differences between the two models, along with the price difference between the part used in the P-7808u and the P-7811. Only four items have changed, as far as we can tell.
Gateway P-7811 FX Specifications | ||
Component | Description | Price Change (to P-7808u) |
Processor | Core 2 Duo P8400 (2.26GHz 3MB 1066FSB) | $145 |
Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 8900M GTS 512MB NVIDIA drivers: 176.02 (beta from Gateway) |
$25 |
Display | 17" WUXGA (1920x1200) Glossy (AU Optronics B170UW02 V0) |
-$76 |
Hard Drive | 200GB Seagate Momentus 7200.2 | $30 |
Total Price Change | $124 |
Looking at the specifications, you do get more performance for your money, mainly thanks to the quad-core CPU and GeForce 9800M GTS 1GB. You also get a 500GB 5400RPM hard drive (with the ability to add a second drive later if you want). Those areas are upgraded relative to the P-7811, but in one area you actually get less: the P-7808u includes a WXGA+ LCD running at 1440x900 instead of the WUXGA (1920x1200) on the P-7811 - it's a panel similar to the original P-6831, though from a different manufacturer.
The downgraded LCD is unfortunate but in some ways it's good: plenty of users feel the native WUXGA resolution results in text and images that are "too small" even on a 17" LCD. The 1440x900 display is more legible in terms of small font sizes, though we never had any complaints even when running the P-7811 at 1920x1200 (YMMV). The lower resolution also fits better with the moderate GPU, providing increased frame rates at the native LCD resolution. Oddly enough, the GPU is now a 1GB model instead of a 512MB model. While we have certainly seen games benefit from increased GPU memory, it is typically useful at higher resolutions, so the added memory mostly goes to waste right now. It's possible that future games will make better use of GPU RAM, but more likely is that any games that see a benefit in the future will also need more GPU power.
Looking at the price changes, what we end up with is that the jump from the P-7811 to the P-7808u changes some components, but despite the intervening eight months the relative price has actually increased! With the downgraded LCD and the upgraded CPU, GPU, and HDD (unless the 1GB 9800M GTS is substantially more than the 512MB model), the P-7808u should only cost around $125 to $150 more than the original price of the P-7811. In fact, if you want a more reasonable alternative, you might want to look at the P-7807u at just $1400, which uses a 320GB 7200RPM HDD and a P8600. Sadly, the P-7801u that included the nicer WUXGA LCD is no longer available for $1300.
The quick summary is that in terms of pricing and features, Gateway has moved up the ladder quite a bit without a lot of extra performance. We'll look at how things actually stack up in benchmarks, but unless you really need the (slower clocked) quad-core CPU we think some of the other Gateway P-78xx laptops are a better buy. On the other hand, the P-7808u does appear to be the least expensive quad-core notebook that doesn't cut corners in the GPU department.
Speaking of which, as we mentioned in our review of the Toshiba X305-Q725, NVIDIA recently released updated mobile GPUs, specifically the GT 100M and 200M series. At first glance, many will assume the 9800M parts are now completely outdated, but the newer parts are merely "optimized and refined" versions of the venerable G92M/G94M cores. The GTX 280M can average around 25% more performance than the "old" 9800M GTX - it has 128 SPs instead of 112, and slightly higher clock speeds. That would obviously be faster than the 9800M GTS in the 7808u, which packs 64 SPs at lower clock speeds. The 9800M GTS falls roughly between the GTS 160M and the GTS 150M, both of which also pack 64 SPs but at slightly higher or lower clock speeds. Saying that the newer parts are merely optimized versions of the older cores does omit one useful detail: the older parts are 65nm chips and the new parts are 55nm. That means besides having slightly higher clock speeds, the chips should also run a bit cooler and use less power. Those are both nice benefits and given the choice, we would want the newer parts. However, the older parts are still competitive in terms of performance so if the price is right they are fine chips.
If everything isn't clear, the short summary is that the P-7808u looks to be a decent notebook at a price point that's higher than the previous Gateway P-series FX retail offerings. We expect performance to be quite similar to the discontinued P-7811, except in applications that leverage the power of the upgraded quad-core processor. Truth be told, we wish the P-7811 were still available for $1450, as we prefer the feature set it offered. Specifically, we liked the WUXGA LCD a lot more than the WXGA+ LCD - and it's not just about the increased resolution, as we will see later.
16 Comments
View All Comments
andrezunido - Monday, April 13, 2009 - link
Battery/Technology isn't there yet for "affordable" pc gaming on the move. Is it possible that these lower quality screens have substancial power savings when compared to screens like the Dell's XPS 16, or are they just to save on the moneys?It's nice to see the Apple laptops in the battery charts but since these are almost "consoles" (OS and hardware fine tunned for each other - I think Apple compiles the OS with special optimizations for its hand picked hardware), can they really be compared?
crimson117 - Monday, April 13, 2009 - link
Sure they can be compared... hardware manufacturers are allowed to work with MS for driver and OS optimization to make their parts work well with Windows, if they want to.andrezunido - Monday, April 13, 2009 - link
...they should have to! Buggy drivers are responsible for lots of power leaks in idle hardware (low power consumption modes in some drivers are non existent). One of the main reasons for this lack of optimization is the big market for PC's and competition between hardware manufacturers to get the hardware out without proper testing, or drivers that don't support proper power saving optimizations. Of course some of this can be blamed on the "generic" nature of the OS (running on various permutations of hardware), making the testing of hardware/software difficult.The Mac OS has the drivers for its limited hardware configurations partially written by the OS maker allowing the fine-tune of the OS for each computer hardware installation.
Like Anand said in a article, its a model/year thing just like a car. The optimization and integration of hardware and software is a well thought thing in a Mac.
In a generic PC the only way that i know of accomplishing this battery efficiency is by building your own Linux installation (i.e. using Gentoo) and tinker with the kernel, drivers and settings to achieve a power efficient installation (see: http://www.lesswatts.org/)">http://www.lesswatts.org/).
Wrapping it up: It can be compared, but... one has to be mindful of what is what.
andrezunido - Monday, April 13, 2009 - link
Sorry for the bad link, if anyone is interested in getting a bit more power efficient on Linux, http://www.lesswatts.org/">http://www.lesswatts.org/ has some nice software and information.Anyway, the P-7808u seems like a very capable machine for its price. Too bad about the screen quality, being the first thing I consider on a Laptop (Second is Battery), I find it too bad that it was "downgraded" when everything else seemed to be bumped up (even the price unfortunately).
I guess the battery would have to be a expensive monster to feed this kind of performance machine with a decent autonomy. But the screen would have added a lot a value with "potentially" less investment from the manufacturer.
djc208 - Monday, April 13, 2009 - link
I had figured one of these would be top contender for my next laptop but I'm not impressed with this "update". The worst part is that there really isn't a lot of competition for this notebook, even at smaller chassis sizes.I'll just have to hope Gateway or some other company will fill this niche properly by the time I'm ready to buy later this summer.
Thanks for the honest review, hopefully someone at Gateway is listening.
djc208 - Monday, April 13, 2009 - link
I had figured one of these would be top contender for my next laptop but I'm not impressed with this "update". The worst part is that there really isn't a lot of competition for this notebook, even at smaller chassis sizes.I'll just have to hope Gateway or some other company will fill this niche properly by the time I'm ready to buy later this summer.
Thanks for the honest review, hopefully someone at Gateway is listening.